I'm neither. I'm evaluating VMware. This started with me stating that I find it disconcerting that a data corruption bug was triaged as a low priority. The low priority bit was my assumption based on the thread statements and timing. Steve replied with a vehement argument that I'm mistaken, so perhaps I am.
In any event, I was merely observing that as a potential customer, it's a major turn-off to run into data corruption. It's very scary to see any sort of data corruption bug sit open for an extended period of time.
In my case, I'm evaluating VMware Workstation and Fusion for potential use in a dev ops project with Vagrant and Chef. I will likely recommend we stick with VirtualBox due to this bug. Will VMware feel any sort of loss from this decision? Probably not. However, I'll pass on VMware enterprise offerings for the data center as well.